Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines

Main

Discussion

Assessment

Requests

Members

Articles
(Featured · New · Popular)

Sources

Portal

Shortcuts

This is the discussion page of Tambayan Philippines, where Filipino contributors and contributors to Philippine-related articles discuss general matters regarding the development of Philippine-related articles as well as broad topics on the Philippines with respect to Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects. Likewise, this talk page also serves as the regional notice board for Wikipedia concerns regarding the Philippines, enabling other contributors to request input from Filipino Wikipedians.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about the Philippines and other Philippine-related topics. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this page. You may wish to ask factual questions about the Philippines and other Philippine-related topics at the Reference desk. Please limit all discussion to topics pertaining to this WikiProject or its pages.

Start new topic

On 9 August 2024, it was proposed that this page be moved to Wikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan Philippines. The result of the discussion was Not moved.

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Pinoy Wikipedia on social media

Carbon Market

Could somebody please assess the quality of this article? Right now it's assessed as a Start, but I think it fulfills all of the B-Class criteria. Please ping me when you're done. Thank you and Salamat po, and Happy Easter. Bearian (talk) 03:03, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I made a couple of tweaks, per the sources. Not sure if it is complete enough for a B rating, but it is definitely more than a Start, and is easily a C. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 05:06, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My rater tool says its 69.6% B-class. So that's good for at least a C but I wouldn't mind giving it a B. D-Flo27 (talk) 12:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Salamat po. Bearian (talk) 11:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Alexandra Eala#Requested move 24 March 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Alexandra Eala#Requested move 24 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPath^talk 11:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nora Aunor?

Is anyone else working on her page right now so it could qualify for RD? Given how she's an icon of Philippine media, it would be weird if even now no one was bringing her up to stuff. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 05:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been doing periodic cleanup and commented on RD nomination. Borgenland (talk) 05:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Solicitor General of the Philippines

I've assessed the article as a Start-Class. Do you think it's a C-Class? Bearian (talk) 11:47, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a C-Class yet, most of the paragraphs on the History section lacks inline citations, which are what needed for it to become a C-Class. AstrooKai (Talk) 11:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTAFORUM on Talk:Unexplained wealth of the Marcos family

Hi. I noticed that there were a lot of opinion posts on Talk:Unexplained wealth of the Marcos family.

I added a WP:NOTAFORUM banner on the Talk Page, which I don't think is visible enough. But at least it's there. But should we also be removing the many comments? Or at least archiving them?

- Chieharumachi (talk) Chieharumachi (talk) 08:12, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly. At least the 2025 posts are all the same person, and I suspect the 2023 post is that person too. CMD (talk) 08:18, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely remove, if not WP:DENY. Borgenland (talk) 08:32, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just wiped them off. Some kind of lock or block may also be necessary. Borgenland (talk) 08:35, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather have them deleted than archived per WP:NOTFORUM. There's no useful purpose for them to be archived. AstrooKai (Talk) 08:33, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added an additional page notice that will pop up at the top when they edit the page. But yes, most of the time, just remove Forum like posts. These kinds of articles always attracts this kind of attention. If someone keeps reposting over and over (more than a few times), they can be blocked only from editing the article and/or the talk page for that article by any admin, under WP:DE. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 10:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]